Man City, Why Brighton and Carabao Cup — coverage from 2 publishers
Heading compiled by PageNews from this coverage. Every headline below belongs to its publisher.
Compare coverage — 2 reports
| Publisher | Headline | Summary | Published | Detected | Delay | Source | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sky Sports | Man City dump Brighton out of Carabao Cup after shoot-out victory |
Carabao Cup holders Manchester City needed penalties to progress past Brighton and into the quarter-finals after battling from behind to draw the game 2-2 at the Etihad. |
0m | skysports.com | First Page headline | ||
| The Independent Sport | Man City pip Brighton on penalties to keep Carabao Cup defence on track as Bournemouth, Crystal Palace and Sunderland progress |
Geronimo Rulli made two fine saves in the shootout to take the holders through, while Bournemouth, Crystal Palace and Sunderland also progressed |
34m | independent.co.uk | Latest |
Headlines and summaries belong to the publisher named beside them. “Published” is what their feed stated; “detected” is when PageNews first held the report. Delay is measured from the earliest report on this event and describes timing only.
Coverage analysis
PageNews compared 2 reports of this event on framing. Each score describes the language one report used, not whether it was right.
What each report emphasised
- Sky Sports more consequence focus than the other reports here
Where the reports diverged most
Language used about people and organisations
Tone measures the language around each mention in that one report, on a scale from −100 to +100. It is not a view of the person or organisation, and it is not a description of the publisher.
Measured by PageNews from the headline and the publisher’s own summary, not from the full articles. Scores describe word choice and emphasis; the percentage beside each is confidence, which is separate from the score and lower when there was less text to read. How this is measured.
Reader comments
Comments are written by readers. PageNews does not check them and does not stand behind them, and a name here is a name someone typed, not a person we have identified.
Nobody has commented on this story yet.