Australia and South Africa — coverage from 2 publishers
Heading compiled by PageNews from this coverage. Every headline below belongs to its publisher.
Compare coverage — 2 reports
| Publisher | Headline | Summary | Published | Detected | Delay | Source | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Guardian Sport | Record-breaking quartet put Australia in full control against South Africa |
Australia 390 & 33-0; South Africa 284Starc, Hazlewood, Cummins and Lyon share nine wicketsAs a fractured news environment demonstrates, observations can be made from just about any perspective. One v |
0m | theguardian.com | First Page headline | ||
| Sky Sports | Cummins helps Australia take control against South Africa |
Pat Cummins claimed 3-54 as Australia took a 139-run lead against South Africa at stumps on day three of the first Test in Durban. |
38m | skysports.com | Latest |
Headlines and summaries belong to the publisher named beside them. “Published” is what their feed stated; “detected” is when PageNews first held the report. Delay is measured from the earliest report on this event and describes timing only.
Coverage analysis
PageNews compared 2 reports of this event on framing. Each score describes the language one report used, not whether it was right.
What this coverage raises
- Immediate consequences 1 of 2 reports
- Confrontation 1 of 2 reports
How many of the reports below framed this event in each of those terms, and how strongly. It records what publishers wrote about, not what will happen — PageNews makes no forecast and has no model of any of these.
What each report emphasised
- Sky Sports more conflict framing than the other reports here
Where the reports diverged most
Measured by PageNews from the headline and the publisher’s own summary, not from the full articles. Scores describe word choice and emphasis; the percentage beside each is confidence, which is separate from the score and lower when there was less text to read. How this is measured.
Reader comments
Comments are written by readers. PageNews does not check them and does not stand behind them, and a name here is a name someone typed, not a person we have identified.
Nobody has commented on this story yet.