One event. Multiple sources.
Sports

Ref Watch: Did VAR come to an incorrect decision for Havertz penalty appeal?

1 publisher 2 reports first detected 3% of 34 Sports publishers

Headline as filed by Sky Sports.

Compare coverage — 2 reports

Every publisher that filed on this event, earliest first, with each one's headline, summary, times and how long after the first report they filed.
Publisher Headline Summary Published Detected Delay Source Status
Sky Sports Ref Watch: Did VAR come to an incorrect decision for Havertz penalty appeal?
The Ref Watch panel discuss VAR's decision to not award Arsenal a penalty against Hull.
0m skysports.com First
Sky Sports Ref Watch: Did VAR come to an incorrect decision for Havertz penalty appeal?
The Ref Watch panel discuss VAR's decision to not award Arsenal a penalty against Hull.
0m skysports.com Latest

Headlines and summaries belong to the publisher named beside them. “Published” is what their feed stated; “detected” is when PageNews first held the report. Delay is measured from the earliest report on this event and describes timing only.

Reader comments

Comments are written by readers. PageNews does not check them and does not stand behind them, and a name here is a name someone typed, not a person we have identified.

Nobody has commented on this story yet.

Add a comment

Up to 2,000 characters. Links are not accepted. Blank lines separate paragraphs.

In this story
Ref Watch 12 Kai Havertz 7 Community Shield. Arsenal 196 Charley Hull 22

Related coverage

connected by shared subjects