Science
We’ve long thought that time has only one dimension. What if we’re wrong?
Headline as filed by New Scientist.
Compare coverage — 1 report
| Publisher | Headline | Summary | Published | Detected | Delay | Source | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Scientist | We’ve long thought that time has only one dimension. What if we’re wrong? |
A second dimension of time has long seemed wholly incompatible with reality. But fresh insights involving black holes and quantum mechanics suggest it deserves another look |
0m | newscientist.com | First |
Headlines and summaries belong to the publisher named beside them. “Published” is what their feed stated; “detected” is when PageNews first held the report. Delay is measured from the earliest report on this event and describes timing only.
Reader comments
Comments are written by readers. PageNews does not check them and does not stand behind them, and a name here is a name someone typed, not a person we have identified.
Nobody has commented on this story yet.