Technology
Wikipedia often gets taken for granted – but its history is fascinating, and its future is fragile
Headline as filed by The Guardian Tech.
Compare coverage — 1 report
| Publisher | Headline | Summary | Published | Detected | Delay | Source | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Guardian Tech | Wikipedia often gets taken for granted – but its history is fascinating, and its future is fragile |
Wikipedia’s 68m articles have been consulted trillions of times. Not bad for a website that has barely changed since it was founded 20 years agoA few years ago, I was struck by the tension between how |
0m | theguardian.com | First |
Headlines and summaries belong to the publisher named beside them. “Published” is what their feed stated; “detected” is when PageNews first held the report. Delay is measured from the earliest report on this event and describes timing only.
Reader comments
Comments are written by readers. PageNews does not check them and does not stand behind them, and a name here is a name someone typed, not a person we have identified.
Nobody has commented on this story yet.