One event. Multiple sources.
Science

You Can See Everything review: Elizabeth Holmes film is absurd but captivating

1 publisher first detected 3% of 40 Science publishers

Headline as filed by New Scientist.

Compare coverage — 1 report

Every publisher that filed on this event, earliest first, with each one's headline, summary, times and how long after the first report they filed.
Publisher Headline Summary Published Detected Delay Source Status
New Scientist You Can See Everything review: Elizabeth Holmes film is absurd but captivating
Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim’s look at the disgraced founder of Theranos, You Can See Everything, had Grace Wade on the edge of her seat – but is it more concerned with entertainment or truth-se
0m newscientist.com First

Headlines and summaries belong to the publisher named beside them. “Published” is what their feed stated; “detected” is when PageNews first held the report. Delay is measured from the earliest report on this event and describes timing only.

Reader comments

Comments are written by readers. PageNews does not check them and does not stand behind them, and a name here is a name someone typed, not a person we have identified.

Nobody has commented on this story yet.

Add a comment

Up to 2,000 characters. Links are not accepted. Blank lines separate paragraphs.

In this story
Elizabeth Holmes 32 You Can See Everything 20 Theranos 15 Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim 3

Related coverage

connected by shared subjects